Positive Cynicism – It’s not Watchmen, it’s you
Aaron R. Davis |
As many predicted, Watchmen had a huge drop-off in its second week -something like 78 percent – and quickly went from anticipated masterpiece to epic disappointment. I’m honestly not surprised. After all, I thought it was one of the great science fiction epics of recent years. That alone seems to guarantee that people won’t get it.
Yes, I think that’s the real problem with the movie: you don’t get it. I know it sounds snobbish and cynical (see column title) to say so, but I also think it’s true. I think there are some basic things that people are getting hung up on that are keeping them from understanding this movie.
A movie is not a comic book. The sex scene is supposed to be slick and stupid. The violence is supposed to be over-the-top and graphic. The heroes are supposed to be able to throw people around like rag dolls and look incredibly muscular for no reason when they put their costumes on. It’s all a commentary on the glossiness of action movies. Watchmen has adolescent attitudes towards sex, violence and casually breaking the laws of physics because action movies are inherently ridiculous. It’s an ironic satire of the kind of movie the studios wanted to turn Watchmen into. The comic book uses comic book devices to deconstruct the very idea of comic books as an outlet for adolescent fantasies of power. The movie does something similar: it takes the conventions of action movies and plays them for how lame they actually are. And it does the same for Alan Moore’s dialogue; the bits that sound dumb in the movie were dumb in the comic book, but they were more acceptable in a comic book because most comic books have dumb dialogue. That was part of Moore’s point, too.
The characters aren’t realistic; they weren’t realistic in the comic book, either. The one thing I’m sick of hearing about the comic book is how realistic the characters supposedly are. I’m not sure Alan Moore’s point was to make the characters realistic in their world of Owlships, bioengineering, electric cars and a nuclear man. His point was actually to show what people who dressed up in costumes and acting like vigilantes would be like if they were real people. There’s an inherent fascism in something like that. By putting on costumes and decided you’re above the law and capable of making rules for everyone else to abide by, you’ve already set yourself apart from the rest of us. The characters in Watchmen reflect that attitude in a variety of ways and with a variety of reactions, but it’s what drives each and every character in both movie and comic. I’m not sure where this realistic humanity is that people are seeing, but it’s not in Watchmen. The characters are psychopaths on some level or other. Which brings me to the next point …
Ordinary human characters are beside the point. Lots of people have complained that they wanted more of the people on the fringes to put a human face on what the characters are trying to save. I don’t think it matters; I think Alan Moore was trying to show a human race that was better off without the policing of costumed nutcases (and would survive regardless of them), and in the movie, no one is particularly concerned about them. There’s a real case to be made that the characters don’t really give a damn about people; they get off on feeling powerful and better than everyone else. Or, like Dr. Manhattan and the Comedian, they just don’t care. Ozymandias’ plan doesn’t have anything to do with saving humanity, and everything to do with self-glorification. It’s no accident he idolizes pharaohs and Alexander the Great; they were greater than the faceless sea of Homeric spear-carriers around them. (See, I can also mix metaphors, too.)
Matthew Goode is miscast. Well … you know, I can’t argue with that one.
Watchmen is a much better movie than The Dark Knight. After months of overpraise for The Dark Knight, it’s no wonder people don’t dig Watchmen more. So many people were cramming down my throat the idea that The Dark Knight was this masterful film that was at once a “metaphor for life in our times” (never got tired of hearing that one repeatedly) and the perfect commentary on the meaning of superhero movies. But really, the criticism of Watchmen seems to me much more descriptive of how I saw The Dark Knight – bleak, soulless, caught up in symbolism, inhuman, unrealistic, too violent, dull and pretentiously overserious. Watchmen – which actually is a great metaphor for our world situation and a great commentary on the meaning of superhero movies – is getting dissed simply for not being more stupid and obvious.
At the end of the day, I think the worst I can say about Watchmen is that it’s too smart for an audience that was hoping it would validate their respect for comics to people who don’t give comics the literary cred they sometimes deserve.
So when I read any review of Watchmen, all I can hear is “I didn’t get it because I wanted it to be something different.” But I think my favorite part of the movie right now is that you didn’t, because it makes its point so much better that way.
Aaron R. Davis lives in a cave at the bottom of the ocean with his eyes shut tight and his fingers in his ears. You can contact him at samuraifrog@yahoo.com.
Related Posts:
Amen brother – I loved the graphic novel but, having come to it late in the piece, don’t have any of the hang-ups which inevitably attach themselves to any cinematic treatment of a long-revered piece of literature. Accordingly, I loved the film as much as the novel, and even felt the ending was a bit of an improvement. Yes, Matthew Goode was miscast, but on the other hand Malin Akerman got her kit off.
Long time fan of your blog and it’s great to see your writing publicised in another forum – no doubt a first step to world domination.
[Reply]
I finally saw Watchmen yesterday and I’ve got to say I can’t disagree with you more.
I found Watchmen to be incredibly cold and boring. You say that the average people in the graphic novel aren’t important to the overall story, but when the movie presents a bleak world where all of the characters are flat and inaccessible, it’s hard to care about Ozymandias’ plan. Watching the film, I felt like Dr. Manhattan, observing the whole thing from Mars. I felt no attachment to the characters or their world, so I didn’t care about the carnage Ozymandias unleashed or the fact that the heroes sold out in the end.
The movie has no life, no emotional resonance. It seems like Snyder was so worried about getting actors who looked exactly like their comic book counterparts (with the exception of Matthew Goode, who was terribly miscast) and making sure the sets matched the panels of the graphic novel, that he forgot to tell a compelling story.
I think people who are enjoying the film are people who have loved the graphic novel for years and have been dreaming about seeing it on-screen. If you’ve been picturing what these characters would look like on the big screen since the graphic novel came out, then Snyder managed to give you the visuals you had always hoped for. But that’s all he gave you – beautiful visuals with no real soul.
The execution is terrible. For people who haven’t read Watchmen, there is no reason to care about the characters or the story. Since the graphic novel is broken up into chapters, there is also no real overall arc to the story, so the movie drags quite a bit in parts.
I have read the graphic novel, but I still found myself not really caring about the film. I like seeing certain parts come to life, but overall I was unimpressed.
And Watchmen is definitely not a better film than Dark Knight. I would never claim that the film is a “metaphor for life in our times” or “the perfect commentary on the meaning of superhero movies.” But it is an incredibly entertaining film. It had more depth than most comic book movies, but was still accessible to people who had never picked up a comic book. Instead of just copying the source material panel for panel, Nolan gave his own interpretation of Batman and The Joker, but stayed true to the spirit of the characters. And most of all, Nolan told a great story, which at the end of the day is all that really matters.
Watchmen is a brilliant graphic novel, but it was made into a lousy film. And while I agree with you that there is a lot of depth and meaning in the film, unfortunately it will be missed by most people due to the poor execution of the story. So instead of showing people who don’t read comics what they have been missing all these years, Snyder gave them a film that will push them even farther away from comic books.
[Reply]
But, of course, this is where I disagree with a lot of people; all of the criticisms you have–“cold,” “boring,” “flat,” “inaccessible”–describe exactly how I felt about The Dark Knight. And I thought it was more cynical than Watchmen. I think Snyder made a film that may have been hard to connect with, but was an interesting intellectual deconstruction of superhero action movies. In contrast, I found The Dark Knight disjointed, overlong, oppressively dull, and surprisingly unentertaining. None of the characters in The Dark Knight are human beings–none of the characters in Watchmen are human beings, either, but at least the film’s honest about it. That’s part of the movie’s point. The Dark Knight is so concerned about what its characters represent that there’s no time left for emotions.
Or for sense, frankly. Nothing in The Dark Knight makes any sense to me. The Joker in that movie is the apotheosis of detailed criminal planning, but Nolan’s selling him as a chaotic element? It’s just three hours of stuff happening with incredible logic leaps and hackneyed attempts to comment on the Bush administration. I don’t think he stayed true to the characters at all, honestly–he’s so caught up in telling you what the characters mean that he forgets to let them be characters. It’s masquerading as a movie with depth and meaning, but the substance is lacking and academic at best. If Heath Ledger hadn’t been so great in that movie, I don’t think anyone would care that much, and it would probably be seen for the overlong mess that it is.
As for Watchmen, I never really much cared about seeing it as a movie. Important or no, the comic book is pretty overrated (and so is Alan Moore, a man who licenses his work to Hollywood and then complains constantly about what they do with it–is that edgy or something?). But I really enjoyed what Snyder did with the movie (including intentionally pissing off the audience). He subverted what people wanted to see, and they hate him for it. It’s no surprise to me.
[Reply]
Cris Reply:
October 22nd, 2015 at 2:10 am
Hey, I know this comment won’t be read, but I really wanted to weigh in. I’ve only been reading your stuff for a few days and I really admire your work and even when I don’t agree I feel like I’ve been given something new to think about. I think the part that really struck me was actually your part when you say Alan More is overrated. I just couldn’t disagree more. The man licensed his products out at first but whether he chooses to or not people can still make movies and not have him weigh in on anything. You do know he deliberately had his name taken off the Watchmen credits and signed away on getting any money for it right? He also took his name off V For Vendetta. Sure the first several films he signed away for the money, but he has to make a living right? Would you honestly turn away the money, but also give the film makers total freedom to do what they wanted? And even if he had tried to weigh in it’s not like authors usually get a lot of say in how it turns out. As for him not liking them but signing anyway, well he’s going to have an opinion and people are going to ask him what it is, so I assume he just answers honestly. Except Watchmen as he refuses to see it. He deliberately made the book unfilmable because he wanted to show comics are a unique medium. If I wanted to see a film that’s a satire of stupid action movies or kids films I’d watch a youtube video made by someone in his own free time who made absolutely no money off of it. It’s the ‘Saturday Morning Watchmen Cartoon.’
[Reply]
I agree with Aaron here. I can’t agree with Joel though I can see where your comming from. I never read Watchmen (or many graphic novels for that matter) and I loved this film. Everything Aaron said I agree with. I immediately connected with the depiction of the heros as jaded and flawed, the criticism of the Ideas people have about comic books, comic book heros, and heros in general, and the moral ambiguity that all of these things represent. I thought this was a very intelligent and thought provoking film, and when I went in to see it I knew next to nothing about the comic. Similarly I loved the Dark Knight…I thought it was entertaining, but it didn’t make me think the way this movie did. It didn’t raise the same questions and it wasn’t as intelligent or self aware. All in all a good post Aaron, good to see some one out there writing about the film and not whining about it.
[Reply]