Murphy’s Law – Marge Simpson, Playboy playmate
October 14, 2009 11:00 am Murphy's Law
Joel Murphy |
In a move that absolutely reeks of desperation, Marge Simpson will appear on the cover of next month’s Playboy magazine. And no, I don’t mean Julie Kavner, the woman who has voiced Marge Simpson for the past 20 years. For the first time ever, Playboy’s cover will actually feature a cartoon character.
Marge appears naked on the cover, sitting in a bunny-shaped chair in an obvious homage to Darine Stern’s groundbreaking October 1971 cover. (Stern was the first black woman to appear on the front of the magazine.) Thank God Stern was able to break down those barriers so that 38 years later a cartoon could finally get a chance to appear on the cover. Perhaps in another 38 years, an inkblot or a doodle will finally get their chance to shine.
Currently, the average age of Playboy’s readers is 35. The powers that be at the magazine are hoping Marge Simpson will attract a younger audience. It could work. After all, I would have to imagine that the average age of a person who would pay to see a cartoon character naked would have to be around 12, so that should definitely bring the median age down, provided these kids all go to stores that don’t card.
In addition to their addressing their aging fanbase, Playboy also really needs a boost in sales. The first half of 2009 has been disappointing for the company. The magazine fell 200,000 sales short of its $2.6 million rate base, which is the minimum number of sales it promises to advertisers. Considering that newspapers and magazines are all struggling to stay afloat these days, that is definitely not a good thing.
The biggest factor contributing to dwindling sales is fairly obvious – the vast amount of smutty pictures available for free on the Internet. It’s a tough sell to convince today’s 18-year-old to shell out cash for your magazine, which features fairly pedestrian and tasteful photos of naked women, when they can find incredibly graphic photos of women (with men or other women or sometimes farm animals) for free on the Internet. Your average 18-year-old has grown up with the Internet, it’s always been a part of his life – so to him, Playboy seems like an antique; a relic from an ancient time.
And don’t give me that bullshit about reading Playboy for the articles. Yes, Playboy does have some quality articles. They tend to get some great celebrity interviews and talented fiction writers like Stephen King and Chuck Palahniuk have had their work published in the magazine over the years. But it’s not like you can sit in an airport or a Starbucks or a playground and read those articles without everyone thinking you’re a giant perv. There is a stigma attached to Playboy that keeps it from being acceptable casual reading. That’s why a magazine like Maxim is an easier sell for people looking for something to read, even though the articles and photo spreads are nowhere near as good as those found in Playboy.
I seriously doubt the allure of seeing Marge Simpson in Playboy is going to be enough to convince the younger demographic to pick up the magazine. That’s not to say there isn’t a market for it – even though it weirds me out, I know plenty of people are into seeing cartoon characters naked. But I seriously doubt that Matt Groening gave the go-ahead to show Marge completely nude, so you are unlikely to see any more skin than you’ve already see in some of the more risqué episodes of the show (like the one where Marge and Homer ended up running naked through Springfield, hiding behind lawn ornaments to cover their naughty bits).
|
And there’s also the problem of that pesky Internet again. For one thing, when the magazine hits newsstands on Friday, someone will scan it and everyone will be able to see Marge’s pictures online for free. And secondly, she’s not a real person, she’s a cartoon character. So since she’s a cartoon character, anyone with enough artistic talent and a dirty enough mind can already produce a realistic naked picture of her. Those of you with a bit more intestinal fortitude than I posses can try Googling “Marge Simpson naked” right now – I’m sure you will get quite a few hits, many of them drawn just as well as the ones featured in Playboy and all of them much more graphic and disturbing.
(Seriously though, one of these days someone will have to explain to me the fascination with cartoon porn. You can see real women naked on the Internet, why would you want to see cartoons? What is the appeal? They are cartoons. Drawings. Just lines on a piece of paper. Marge Simpson has giant blue hair, yellow skin and a ridiculous upper lip – what is sexy about that? Why does that turn people on? And what the hell is up with those crazy Japanese cartoons where the ladies get felt up by tentacles? Seriously, someone needs to sit down and have a nice long fatherly talk with that country.)
I guess I can’t blame Playboy for trying something bold. After all, it beats the other big name they have lined up for the magazine – Tara Reid. I may not get the whole cartoon thing, but even I think Marge Simpson is more attractive than Tara Reid these days (and more lifelike).
So good luck Playboy, hopefully this move pays off and gives you the sales needed to keep your magazine afloat. And, if not, there’s always Lois Griffin.
Joel Murphy is the creator of HoboTrashcan, which is probably why he has his own column. He loves pugs, hates Jimmy Fallon and has an irrational fear of robots. You can contact him at murphyslaw@hobotrashcan.com.




Bill :
Date: October 14, 2009 @ 3:54 pm
Despite the hype, Marge isn’t the first cartoon character to grace the cover of Playboy. Jessica Rabbit was: http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/7213/rabbit3hf5.jpg Considering what one can find on the internet in terms of fine art photos, you can finally say you read Playboy for the articles and really mean it. I myself would much rather sit in an airport reading Playboy than Maxim. Playboy does have a certain cache due to it’s longevity, the Playboy clubs, and the quality of writers and interviews that they have (was there ever a more poignant interview than the Lennon one?)that I really don’t think people would look twice at someone reading one in public (I don’t think Maxim would be fine playground reading material either). Juggs on the other hand, may cause a problem. The photos of Marge are already on the net (I saw them on a Howard Stern message board surprise, surprise) and they are kinda cute. Nothing graphic, they are an interesting throwback and tribute to the original “Girl Next Door” look of Playboy in the 50’s and 60’s. Look at the cover and the stories that are in this issue and whether it’s Marge or that other cartoon character, Pamela Anderson, on the cover, it’s looks like a pretty interesting issue. When Haley from American Dad appears on the cover of Barely Legal, then you may have a point….
Scott :
Date: October 14, 2009 @ 7:16 pm
I don’t know about anyone else but I have never bought a Playboy in my life but am going to be picking up a few of these next month for the sheer celectability of them. They will go into a box in the back of the closet and some simpsons collector a decade or two down the line will be dying for one (least thats my hope). I dont the fascination with cartoons either…. though if I could find myself a real life Lois… but I digress.
Thor :
Date: October 15, 2009 @ 12:45 am
Marge & Lois have nothing on Betty Rubble!
I don’t understand the whole cartoon thing but then I’m too close to the average age of a playboy reader to make a difference even if I was intrigued. As someone my ageing mind can now not recall once said “why stare at the pictures in a recipe book if you’re hungry? Get off your ass and do something about your hunger!”
What would Grandpa Simpson say? Probably something about fashion being wearing an onion
on your belt.
Sasparilla Gretsch :
Date: October 15, 2009 @ 12:03 pm
My big problem is that it seems highly uncharacteristic of Marge to do something like this. Sure, she has a wild streak like all hot cartoon MILFs, but I don’t think she’d pose nude in a magazine knowing that her son and his weird friend might take it up to the treehouse with them late at night when everyone is asleep . . .
Joelle :
Date: October 15, 2009 @ 1:18 pm
Cartoon porn: I don’t get it, either.
Regardless, I don’t think it’ll have much influence on the sales of the magazine. They might get a little boost from the publicity, but I don’t think it’ll have long-term impact.
The times they are a-changin’ and all the free stuff on the internets means that print must either adapt or fail. This tactic may have worked in 1999, but is fairly laughable now.
Amanda Lowery :
Date: October 16, 2009 @ 10:18 am
I agree Joelle. But what happens now?
Does print just roll over and take it?
How does a magazine you dish out dough for compete with some of the awesome free raunchiness you can find on said ‘internets’?
Plus, with the advent of hand held internet access – the argument for portability doesn’t even exist anymore. Added Bonus: No more sticky pages, AND your mom won’t find the magazines tucked under your mattress. (Though I must say that while finding cartoon porn would be disturbing, it is oddly innocent at the same time – like you can’t quite bring yourself to the real thing, it’s almost sweet.)
I kinda feel like Marge was used – she is a giant commodity in this dying industry of tactfully positioned, eloquently written, and beautifully airbrushed interpretations of sexual reality.
She is the last icon of pornographic innocence before print mags fold to the encroaching powers of raw internet porn. Hold onto your hats ladies and gentlemen, we’re in for a graphic ride.