Murphy’s Law – I irrationally hate Avatar
Joel Murphy |
All indications are that Avatar is a wonderful film.
Early reviews are trickling in and everyone seems to be praising James Cameron for immersing viewers in a lush 3D environment and telling them a beautiful story. The film currently has a 91 percent approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes. After a 12 year hiatus following the unparalleled success of Titanic, all indications are that Cameron has another blockbuster on his hands.
And yet, I have no interest in seeing the film.
The strangest thing is – I can’t really seem to figure out why.
It’s possible that it’s the weird blue cat people that live on Cameron’s magical land of Pandora. Something about them certainly does give me the willies.
Then again, it could also be the 161 minutes, 34 second run time, which guarantees that after you add in the endless parade of previews and commercials, chances are three-quarters of the way into the movie you will be urinating in your soda cup to keep from missing any of that lush 3D environment and beautiful story.
Or it’s possible that even though people are touting this film as some amazing new innovation, it really just looks like a three-hour video game. Now sure, seeing the visual effects on a giant movie screen may be slightly more impressive than playing Gears of War or Halo on my home television, but at least those games are kind enough not to tack on a tree-hugging story about how the white man is stealing all the natural resources from the majestic weird blue cat people and it’s up to the heroic, but tragically paralyzed, Marine to save them.
It could also be the fact that James Cameron himself is an insufferable ass. He’s been telling anyone who will listen just how groundbreaking and amazing Avatar is. And I still can’t shake the image of him at the podium accepting his Academy Award, arms outstretched, shouting: “I’m the king of the world.” Sure, Cameron has made great films, mainly Terminator, Terminator 2 and Aliens, but the first person telling you how great his films are is Cameron himself.
And also, Titanic sucked … there, I said it. It’s an overrated, pretentious, boring film. And ladies, no man who you met just days before is going to let you hog all the real estate on the floating debris while he freezes to death in the icy waters, so just give up that little fantasy now. Jesus, Lloyd Dobler was a more realistic and obtainable male archetype than Jack “Get swept away by my boyish good looks and ignore the fact that I play the same smug, annoying character in every fucking movie” Dawson.
Or maybe it’s that incredibly grating song, “I See You” by Leona Lewis … the one that actually makes me long for the days of “My Heart Will Go On.”
But honestly, I don’t think it is any of that. Sure, I may have a few biases against the film, but I fully admit that most of them are just me being nitpicky. I honestly believe Chris Hewitt, the reviewer for Empire, who wrote: “If you can let go of your version and embrace Cameron’s – if you’re not, in other words, one of those splenetic Internet fanboy types who’ve apparently made their minds up about Avatar before seeing it – then Avatar is a hugely rewarding experience: rich, soulful and exciting in the way that only comes from seeing a master artist at work.”
Now, I certainly don’t see myself as a “splenetic Internet fanboy” (and that’s mainly because I have no idea what the word “splenetic” means, since no normal human being has ever used it in a sentence before), but I see Hewitt’s point. And I do believe that all I would have to do is just give the film a chance and I would probably love it.
But I don’t want to give it a chance.
And I think it’s because everyone is telling me that it’s this must-see film. Reviewers make it sound like the next Citizen Kane; like my life will somehow be changed forever by seeing it. Perhaps I am in the minority here, but instead of being someone who has been eagerly anticipating the arrival of this film, I have just spent months reading about how I should be eagerly anticipating this movie, which just rubs me the wrong way. It just doesn’t seem organic to me. All of the praise and claims of it being a revolutionary film-going experience just ring hollow to me.
It’s like I can see the strings moving on this one. I can hear the hum of the hype machine. Or, to use a more colorful metaphor, it’s like someone took me on a tour of a meat packing plant and now that I know how the sausages are made, I’ve lost my appetite. All I can see is the hype – the full-on media blitz telling me that I should love this film and, as a result, I want to see it less and less.
Not that it matters one way or another. This film is going to do big business, whether I want to see it or not. It may not do Titanic numbers, but it’s going to make big money. And, at some point, even if it’s not until the film comes out on Netflix, I will probably break down and see it too.
After all, I still eat sausages.
Joel Murphy is the creator of HoboTrashcan, which is probably why he has his own column. He loves pugs, hates Jimmy Fallon and has an irrational fear of robots. You can contact him at murphyslaw@hobotrashcan.com.
Related Posts:
I think it’s the story line that’s going to keep me from rushing out to see it. While some of the early reviews were glowing, now some are coming out about how once you look past the effects, the story and dialog blows. While this movie might start off a new 3-D boom, I’m hoping for better stories or else they will all have the allure of the Three Stooges 3-D shorts where the bad guys wave pitchforks and knives menacingly towards the camera.
Agree with what you say about Titanic, by the way, except that I fell in love with Kate Winslet in that movie and that has to count for something…..
[Reply]
Bill:
That’s because Kate Winslet is awesome. Though her talent was not highlighted in that film, mostly do to the incessant use of the name “Jack”, I mean, does anybody ever really address people with their proper name more than three times in one exchange of far from brilliant dialogue? (Makes for a fun drinking game though. I think “Jack” caused my one and only case of alcohol poisioning.)
As for you column, Joel:
That movie looks sappy. I hate it when films cram moral, culturally implicit and socially obvious messages down my throat without the use of underlying themes and creative subtlety. Sure, this promises to be visually creative, but I fear a Titanic outcome of less than stimulating dialogue and frequent cheesiness that I apparently felt compelled to drown in copious amount of alcohol.
A paralyzed young military man (cue sympathy from a youthful American audience that subconsciously identifies with the impact this will have on his ability to fulfill the youthful illusions of military heroism), paired with themes of exploitation and greed which mirror both the Native American plight and the raping of the Environment(and here again is another appeal to a youthful audience with growing awareness of the wrongs of the world; donating an extra dollar at the register to assuage their ‘contributing to the problem with consumer activity’ guilt). It’s a beautiful package of marketing to a specific, money-making guarantee of an audience. But will the film deliver? I highly doubt it. (Drink)
[Reply]
Amanda, I actually don’t remember any of the dialog, I just remember HER…
[Reply]
Bill:
If you are that into Winslet’s boobies, then I hope you’ve seen The Reader.
[Reply]
Hottest naked Nazi ever.
But honestly, the movie that should make you fall in love with Kate Winslet is Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.
[Reply]
My reaction upon seeing the trailer for Avatar: That looks kinda cool. What’s it about? On second thought, I don’t really care. But ooh, pretty.
I hate Titanic. It opened on my birthday in 1997 and I was bitter about that for AGES. I will not be upstaged by Leo! *pout*
And I can’t agree more with your Eternal Sunshine comment, Joel. She’s AMAZING in that movie. I love that movie so much. SO MUCH!
[Reply]
Well, it wasn’t just her breasts, as lovely as they are. Her hair, her face, those eyes and lips….
[Reply]
Firstly splenetic means given to melancholy or marked by bad temper, malevolence, or spite.
Secondly, I rather thought DeCaprio’s character was dying anyway and didn’t have the strength to hold on.
Third, I’m kinda meh about all of Cameron’s films anyway and I think the emphasis graphics are taking in movies is highly overrated. If it looks so fantastic I am sure it will also look good on my tv. Plus, the commercials don’t really excite me, they don’t speak to the plot of the movie at all which makes me thing it won’t have much of one.
[Reply]
April: Thanks! I was going to post the definition, but I always get called out on knowing nerdy stuff.
[Reply]
I amused myself by reading The article and substituting Avatar for Aquaman.
[Reply]
joel, this is the wittiest, most brilliant column ive ever read … you must be quite smart … and handsome
🙂
[Reply]
Hell yeah you eat sausages:)
[Reply]
Saw Avatar, 3-D is stunning. Story is… Well… Shit forget the story the sound and vision was awesome.
However, I’m sure that waiting for the blu-Ray 3-D version release will suffice. No kids (yes morons took their kids) and no alcoholic breathing on you, plus you can skip through the sappy shit (only about 30mins or 1/6th of the movie).
[Reply]
Man I’m so glad I’m not the only one who feels that way about this movie. The more people talk about how great it is, the less I want to see it. That’s exactly it. Thank you for finding the words I was searching for!
And it seems to have brought out the wackos in droves, so let’s give a round of applause to James Cameron for that.
You are spot-on about Cameron promoting his own movies before everybody else. I thought this movie was out months and months before the release just because people wouldn’t stop talking about it.
Plus now everybody who sees this movie automatically thinks they know film. Man, it’s sad. Haha tragic really, and painfully hilarious.
Anyway, thank you for the article, awesome job.
[Reply]
I went to see it and i was so disappointed that i became a hater of avatar…
I found this article searching the internet cos i had a feeling that im losing my mind, apparently 95% of people like it!
I have never seen such a bad movie with this kind of critical acclaim!
That is horrifying…
There’s nothing new in this film, nothing we haven saw before!!!
Even that connecting with animals with there tail is from some japanese move from 80’s as my SF-fan firend told me…
Avatar sucks big time!!!
[Reply]
AVATAR BLOWS!!
I saw the first 70 minutes of this movie and walked out and got my money back. Don’t let this movie separate you from your money. As a story it just plain SUCKS. The writing SUCKS. The acting is canned, stereotypical and shallow. James Cameron is a douchebag.
[Reply]
Of course the movie has been done before– but, remember that we are not the only generation out there. Think about it– kids these days need a MODERN movie that appeals to them in order to pass along all of those “moral, culturally implicit and socially obvious messages.” I remember watching movies with all that “crap” when I was a kid and loving them– they helped shape my views on the world when I was young. So, #2…that’s exactly why this SHOULD be “family friendly” and that’s also a reason as to why this movie SHOULD be so visually stimulating!! With so many messages, the movie NEEDS to appeal to kids growing up right now. Hell, they wont be nearly as interested in older movies just on the premis that their graphics suck!! Kids now have a totally different standard for how good special effects ought to be.
#3. This is also a reason as to why the movie SHOULD be simple.
When you are delivering a powerful message, it needs to be UNDERSTOOD AND APPRECIATED BY THE MASSES. This includes kids and even adults who might not be the “brightest”…
So, I commend James for making an entertaining modern day movie that repeats the same messages found in dances with wolves, etc….it appeals to the masses, which is the most important factor when making a movie with so many important messages. These messages are important to pass down to future generations AND its always important to keep these messages fresh in our minds, so a little repeat can always do some good. Besides, look at what we’re facing in this modern day: this past presidential election emphasized racial differences rather than erradicating them, etc. That was, of course, only one example…but a profound one. Anyway, I’m just saying that the issues depicted in the movie are issues present in our current lives. So, the messages in the movie are NEEDED and people aren’t going to just start flocking to blockbuster to rent Dances Wit Wolves any time soon, so we need a modern day film to pass along the message that appeals to the masses.
[Reply]
^^ And the award for ‘most pretentious, annoying and melodramatic online comment of 2010’ is Tiff!
[Reply]