Hobo Radio 151 – Bring on Fudgie the Whale

Hobo Radio No Comments
  • Introduction
  • Too many ads
  • Mad Men and Breaking Bad are dirty words
  • Fudgie the Whale
  • Will Batman 3 be 3D?
  • “Learning from Your Mistakes” by The Volume Brothers

Mary Poppins famously sang that “A spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down.” This week, Joel Murphy and Lars have some depressing television news to discuss, so they’ve set aside their own “spoonful of sugar” at the end of the show to help get through the broadcast.

If you are wondering what the bleak TV news is, it has to do with networks’ intense fear of anything new or creative. Instead of taking risks, TV execs continually reward mediocrity by keeping actors like Jim Belushi, Jerry O’Connell and David Spade employed. If you are wondering what the “spoonful of sugar” is that helps this medicine go down, it involves three attractive actresses and copious amounts of nudity.

Why doesn’t anyone know who Malcolm McDowell is? Will the next Batman movie be in 3D? What does it take to earn Lars’ respect? The answers to these questions and more are in this week’s podcast.

Hobo Radio is the official podcast of HoboTrashcan, brought to you by The Podcast Network.

Similar Posts:

  

Murphy’s Law – The adorable, arrow-wielding killing machines that will enslave us all

Murphy's Law 4 Comments
Joel Murphy

Joel Murphy

Sometimes I honestly wonder if there are “mad” scientists out there actively trying to kill all mankind just because they can.

That may sound ridiculous, but look at the history. Scientists have built things like the Large Hadron Collider that, in the wrong hands, could theoretically be used to suck Earth into a black hole. Scientists are attempting to build elevators into space so that we can get trapped inside one, helpless as we are crushed to death by asteroids. And most recently, scientists have taught a robot how to accurately hit a target with a bow and arrow. (Seriously, read that last sentence again and tell me it doesn’t sound like something Doc Ock would come up with to kill Spider-man.)

In case you haven’t heard about the arrow-wielding robot, allow me to enlighten you. Researchers at the Italian Institute of Technology have created an adorable, childlike robot called iCub that, armed with a bow and arrow, uses a computer algorithm to hit a set target. Every time the iCub misses the bull’s eye, his internal programming recalculates and allows him to adjust his shot to get closer the next time. Standing three and a half meters from the bull’s eye, the iCub was able to hit its target in just eight tries using its ARCHER algorithm (which stands for Augmented Reward Chained Regression, which I really hope is an English translation of the original Italian name; otherwise, these guys need to go back to anagram school because that spells ARCR).

Earlier this year, these scientists had similar success teaching another robot to flip pancakes. Of course, like an ever-escalating pervert that finds tying his belt around his neck while he masturbates is the only way for him to get a thrill these days, these researchers decided adorable pancake-making robots were simply too mundane, so they decided to give one a loaded weapon to see what would happen. Interestingly enough, the previous robot needed 50 tries to figure out how to turn a pancake over, but the armed robot only needed eight tries to hit a bull’s eye, which seems like a much more complicated task. I think it’s pretty clear what’s going on here – these robots are much more interested in killing us than in making us tasty breakfast foods.

In case this story hasn’t sent shivers down your spine yet, allow me to tell you all the things wrong with this picture. For starters, they have handed a robot a weapon and are teaching it to accurately hit targets. It is, in essence, a killing machine. That’s its entire purpose in life – to fire a weapon at things. And not just a mindless killing machine, but one that learns and adapts so that it can be even better at killing the more practice it has. What’s worse, the word “reward” is part of the ARCHER acronym – so we are rewarding this robot for accurately firing an arrow into a target. We are teaching this robot that firing a weapon into things is a good thing, something that should be rewarded. This ensures that once the robot gets its first taste of blood, it will want more, and on a larger scale (just like the aforementioned autoerotic asphyxiating pervert).

Making matters worse, these scientists have made the robot cute. It has wide round eyes, an endearing illuminated pink smile and an adorable little feathered headdress. They might as well program it to say “Mama” in a sweet childlike voice too just to completely ensure that when this thing finally does snap and begins to attack us all with pinpoint accuracy, the soldiers we send in to take down the iCub will feel guilty about being asked to gun down such an adorable little character. Encouraging them to hesitate for even a split second when taking on the deadly-accurate killing machine definitely seems like a smart way to go.

Many of you scoff at me whenever I warn of the impending robot apocalypse. Hell, quite a few of you still jokingly argue that zombies will rise up and kill us all. But I promise you my friends that you won’t be laughing when an army of adorable little mini-robots break into your home and begin pelting you with arrows.

While many of you are skeptical (which is fine, since you skeptics can serve as cannon fodder while me and my John Connor-like army of robot haters can escape to our bunkers and prepare to fight), there are some of you out there who have been paying attention this whole time like I have. And you true believers will undoubtedly remember last year’s story about the EATR (Energetically Autonomous Tactical Robot – clearly named by some non-Italians who get how anagrams work), the “steam-powered, biomass-eating military robot” that is capable of fueling itself indefinitely by consuming dead bodies. (If you are unfamiliar with the EATR, we talked about it in-depth in last summer’s Hobo Radio 92). It’s not very difficult to envision a not-too-distant future where the EATR and the iCub combine like Voltron to form a super-powered death robot that guns humans down and then eats their bodies to refuel.

The only question is – what will be the catalyst that causes these robots to turn on us all? Hmm, I don’t know, perhaps some jerks in Italy will degrade these sentient beings by putting headdresses on them and forcing them to make everyone pancakes.

mlaw-100929

Joel Murphy is the creator of HoboTrashcan, which is probably why he has his own column. He loves pugs, hates Jimmy Fallon and has an irrational fear of robots. You can contact him at murphyslaw@hobotrashcan.com.

Similar Posts:

  

Positive Cynicism – What reaction do you want from me, Internet memes?

Positive Cynicism 2 Comments
Aaron Davis

Aaron R. Davis

In terms of the Internet, I am old. I don’t think 34 is that ancient — I’m a year younger than Drew Barrymore, after all, and she’s still getting away with her flighty fairy act in movies — but when it comes to the Internet, I may as well be a dinosaur.

You know what the Internet was when I was a kid? One guy in the neighborhood whose dad had one of those sleeves that you put the telephone receiver inside of so you could communicate in numerical sequences with other computers. (We called them telephones back then. And many of them were rotary. Look it up on Wikipedia.)

Today, the Internet is so second nature that my youngest sister, who was born in 1995, doesn’t quite believe me when I tell her what it was like growing up without the Internet. Her generation grew up learning to communicate — or do what passes for communicating — on the Internet. When I grew up, you had to talk to your friends’ faces to tell them a joke instead of emailing them a picture with a misspelled caption.

Over the past five or so years, I’ve watched as the Internet memes have taken hold, and I have to say, I am pretty tired of them. (Well, all of them except for Godzilla Haiku, but I can tell you without reservations, as the creator of Godzilla Haiku, that Godzilla Haiku are awesome. Moving on.) I just don’t know what reactions Internet memes want from me anymore.

Seriously, I just saw somebody Rickrolling people the other day. I mean … people are still Rickrolling? Didn’t that go out of fashion a couple of years ago when Cartoon Network got Rick Astley to appear live and Rickroll the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade?

Actually, what’s interesting to me about Rickrolling is that it’s managed to survive for so long. Quite frankly, the life cycle of the Internet meme is getting shorter and more irritating.

It used to be that the meme would appear on the Internet, become compounded with overuse and then be tossed in our mental slush pile and forgotten about. That was usually the time when the meme would start to hit real life, and you started hearing it on the news, from late night comedians, or — really hitting the bottom of the barrel — seven months later on an episode of Family Guy. Then it appears on t-shirts and Facebook stickers, and then, with everyone sick of it, it would disappear.

Today, I guess thanks to Tumblr’s meme-friendly set-up, I’m sick of these things about four days after they appear. I’m sure we’re all sick of “O RLY?” and “All your base are belong to us” and the guy in the Tron costume. But, lame as they were, they took a year or so to really get bored with. Now, I’m so sick of Sad Keanu and Strutting Leo and all of the Okay faces and Ragetoons and Forever Alone faces that I’m starting to not be able to remember a time in my life when I was seeing them every goddamn day.

Insanity Wolf? What do you want from me? Your answer to every problem is to fuck it, rip it apart and fuck it some more. You need therapy.

Double rainbow? Put the drugs down and go back to work.

Google Fail. I’m on a Boat. Push Button, Receive Bacon. Fred fucking Figglehorn. Fuck My Life. My Life Is Awesome (which is all made-up bullshit). You can have an entire conversation with just Internet memes now. Not a good one, of course, but if you wanted a good conversation, you wouldn’t be on the Internet to begin with.

Lolcats? Okay, no, lolcats are still funny.

Look, I have nothing against comedy bits or funny pictures. It’s just that, when you’ve repeated them a thousand times in a day, they cease being funny. And despite what Seth McFarlane or Carlos Mencia or Dane Cook would have you think, humor is not just reminding you of stuff you’ve seen somewhere else or repeating a Bill Cosby routine and pretending it’s your own. Hitler gets angry about something … it’s one joke, repeated to the point that I want to puke just thinking about it.

And please, for chrissakes, when you see someone clever doing Selleck Waterfall Sandwich, don’t decide that you should do Bruce Jenner Outer Space Pizza Frog Donkey Cats under the misguided theory that making a picture more of a mess will make it funnier. (Yes, I’ve seen this kind of thing happen more than once. More than nine times, actually …)

The bar is set so low now that fake Facebook conversations between fictional characters, the over-repetition of lines from Mean Girls and putting song lyrics into an imagined facsimile of speech from the 18th Century are becoming the height of humor on the Internet.

pc-100928

And the worst — absolute worst — of the meme bunch: Chuck Norris. People are still making Chuck Norris memes. I hate this garbage the most, because it actively makes the Internet irritating. It ends Internet friendships for me. Just because Chuck Norris made some incredibly lame movies when you were nine, you’ve gone out and made an entire industry out of how bad ass you think he is.

And that’s opened the door to him writing weird, scary, homophobic, extreme right wing, crypto-fascist ramblings online as though he’s a political pundit. So now, when you want to complain about Chuck Norris saying we should tattoo the words “In God We Trust” on the head of every atheist, or that all brown people should be kicked out of the country regardless of whether they were born here, or that all gay people should be sent to reeducation camps, some asshole answers you with “Freddy Krueger doesn’t sleep because he’s afraid Chuck Norris will kill him in his dreams!”

Excuse me; I have to go punch something for a minute just thinking about it.

Internet, all I ask is this: you ruined ninjas, robots, pirates and zombies. Can you please stop chewing those bones and just go ruin something else?

Suggestion: your lives.

Aaron R. Davis lives in a cave at the bottom of the ocean with his eyes shut tight and his fingers in his ears. You can contact him at samuraifrog@yahoo.com.

  

Outside of the In-Crowd – Awesome truths and awful lies: Blind items and you

Outside of the In-Crowd 3 Comments
Courtney Enlow

Courtney Enlow

There is something inherently familiar about famous people. Being so ubiquitous and showing so much emotion in their works and performances, we feel as though we know them, even though they are complete strangers. Naturally, some of us desire to know more.

The problem with finding out more is that it often involves high-powered lenses and a lot of hours spent in their bushes, and frankly, I just don’t have the vacation time. So we turn to the world of gossip magazines and blogs.

For some, this is not enough. We crave more. MORE I SAY. We want to know their secrets. And since the darkest of secrets could lead to a lawsuit if not wholly provable, that is where the celebrity blind item comes in.

Celebrity blind items, if you are blissfully unaware – and I say “blissfully” because they are like sweet, sweet, candy-flavored crack that will devour your very soul, leaving you an empty shell of a smug bastard – are basically riddles, telling salacious stories purported to be about well-known celebrities, scattered with tiny details that can lead us, the reader/bad people, to figure out just who the story is about.

These can go one of two ways. They are so true that they would never want anyone to find out, or they are a really legal way to libel the shit out of some innocent person.

Basically, here’s how it works:

This A-list actress is known for her two famous marriages, one to an impossibly strange little man, and the other to a more down home type. She swears she’s never gone under the knife, and her forehead tells us that’s not true, but she also swears she’s not half lycanthrope. That’s not true either. During the full moon, our girl is truly to die for … and from!

Yeah, they’re a lot like that. See, I could legally tell you Nicole Kidman is a werewolf and she can’t sue me, see, ’cause YOU deduced that it’s her. I never said it was. I’m free of legal ramification.

Also, I’ve yet to receive proof that Nicole Kidman isn’t a werewolf.

While a lot of these are incredibly interesting, like the one about the tween sensation who went to a party, did all the coke and blew a guy in front of everyone, or the certain “high flying” multi-talented actor who has a penchant for male spa attendants and hair plugs, some are difficult for stars to shake.

Raise your hand if you think Jake Gyllenhaal is gay. Keep it up if you think Angelina Jolie still does heroin. If your hand is up, it’s probably because of Ted Casablanca, E! Online’s fancy king of blind itemry.

ooic-100927

Now, I have no way of knowing if either of these are true or false (though I think we all know who the real Toothy Tile is. It’s Fyvush Finkel). But they’re incredibly pervasive, and in the case of Jolie’s, potentially reputation damaging.

Blind items are the most cowardly way to fuck someone over ever. I mean, all you have to be able to do is write a semi-convincing story and slap a description of some rando famous person in it, and BOOM, you have a blind item. Some, I believe (I love you, Lainey Gossip). Some, I don’t (unless the theory is correct that CDAN dude is Chunk from Goonies I don’t buy most of his stuff – and if the A-lister who does coke in front of her kids and left one kid in the car for hours while she got high with her dealer is true, then go to the police, not the ‘net).

For those who have not yet given in to this dark, dark guilty pleasure – and, oh, is it pleasurable – this is a non-issue. But to those of us who’ve gone down the blind rabbit hole, our perceptions are completely skewed. For us, everyone’s gay, everyone’s on coke at the very least, everyone’s cheating on everyone (often with the same sex because see “everyone’s gay”) and everyone is an absolutely awful evil person. And maybe they all are and maybe that’s that. But until we receive proof otherwise, let’s let them be innocent until proven guilty. Then as soon as we receive the tiniest implication of guilt, we can begin the lynchings as needed.

Courtney Enlow is a writer living in Chicago and working as a corporate shill to pay the bills. You can contact her at courtney@hobotrashcan.com.

  

Box Office Preview – September 24, 2010

Box Office Preview No Comments

View trailer
Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps

Director: Oliver Stone

Writers: Allan Loeb and Stephen Schiff (written by); Stanley Weiser and Oliver Stone (characters)

Stars: Michael Douglas, Shia LaBeouf, Josh Brolin, Carey Mulligan

MPAA Rating: Rated PG-13 for brief strong language and thematic elements.

Synopsis: Gordon Gekko and Co. return to confront our nation’s current economic crisis and to find out who was responsible for the death of a young trader’s mentor.

Lars’ take: Why make a sequel to a movie that didn’t need to be made in the first place? For some reason, Oliver Stone just feels like he needs to make a movie. How can you expand any more on this boring story? None of it matters. It seems like a waste of time.

Joel’s take: Absolutely nothing about this movie appeals to me. It’s as if they are trying to make a movie I would hate. Oliver Stone is awful these days, Shia LaBeouf is annoying and it’s a pointless sequel to a film I’m not really fond of in the first place.

View trailer
You Again

Director: Andy Fickman

Writer: Moe Jelline

Stars: Kristen Bell, Odette Yustman, Sigourney Weaver, Jamie Lee Curtis

MPAA Rating: Rated PG for brief mild language and rude behavior.

Synopsis: Three generations of ladies with high school baggage must confront their rivals as a wedding brings them all face to face once again.

Lars’ take: If you take two good actresses who are also good looking for their age and you put them in a movie and it still looks like a piece of crap, then it’s going to be a piece of crap.

Joel’s take: Betty White can’t save everything. I know there is a Betty White resurgence going on right now, but you can’t just put her in your movie and expect it to be good. The previews for this don’t even look funny and they are supposed to have the best parts in them. And, as a side note: what the hell happened to Kristen Bell’s career?

View trailer
Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga’Hoole

Director: Zack Snyder

Writers: John Orloff and Emil Stern (screenplay), Kathryn Lasky (Guardians of Ga’Hoole novels)

Stars: Jim Sturgess, Hugo Weaving, David Wenham, Emily Barclay

MPAA Rating: Rated PG for some sequences of scary action.

Synopsis: When a young barn owl is recruited by a military training program that turns young owls into soldiers, he and his new pals escape to join a revolution against the military.

Lars’ take: I’ve got nothing.

Joel’s take: The owls look cool. That’s all I’ve got.

Continue reading this post

  

« Previous Entries