Murphy’s Law – Jack Shephard’s redemption
Joel Murphy |
It’s been a long, hard road for Lost’s Dr. Jack Shephard, but last night he finally showed that after six seasons of being stubborn and smashing things, he finally gets it. Jack certainly hasn’t always been the easiest character to love, but I hope that after last night’s episode, all of you, like me, returned to your seat on the Jack bandwagon.
There is a lot of Jack hate out there, much of it justifiable. Our own Chris Kirkman has definitely had a few choice words for the good doctor over the years. Even I have found myself rolling my eyes a time or two at Jack’s stubbornness. But while at times you just want to sever the guy’s dural sac, it’s easy to forget that at his core, Jack has always been pretty awesome and loveable guy.
Think back to season one. The very first shot is a close up of Jack’s eye. He’s the first character we are introduced to – the first one we make a connection with. From that moment on, as the pilot unfolds, Jack begins saving everyone else’s lives at a breakneck pace. What I’ve always loved about the guy is his intensity in those situations. A switch flips in his head and he just goes full speed with no regard for his own well-being. Go back and rewatch the episode where he gives his own blood to Boone in an attempt to save Boone’s life (even though, at that point, it’s pretty clear Boone isn’t going to make it). Sun finally has to convince Jack to stop the transfusion. You get the impression that if she didn’t, he would just keep giving his own blood to Boone until Jack either passed out or died.
Of course, what I’ve really always found compelling about Jack was what a train wreck his personal life actually was off the island. It’s not that Jack is a hero – in today’s television landscape, a true white hat hero would be boring to watch. No, Jack’s not a hero. Instead, he has a hero complex. He needs to fix things, needs to be everyone’s savior. Maybe I’ve just always been drawn to characters on the verge of a nervous breakdown, but I’ve always really been fascinated by the way Jack always seems to be dancing on the edge of a precipice. It’s been both compelling and heartbreaking to see him finally tumble over that edge. (And, as a bonus, when he did finally snap, he grew that amazing Ron Burgundy beard.)
That being said, I completely understand why fans started to turn on Jack. I think it all started back in season three, before the makers of the show had set a definite end date. Season three will forever be remembered as the season where the show just plodded along without a rudder; the writers unsure how much real information to give away since they didn’t know how long they would have to stretch the show out. I’ve actually heard that the thinking by ABC executives at the time was that the show could go on forever. In their minds, Dr. Jack Shephard was the star of the show – just give the fans a Jack-centric episode and they will love it. That is, of course, how we ended up with one of the most pointless episodes of the entire series – the infamous Bai Ling “Jack’s tattoo” show.
Jack’s image could have been salvaged after season three, but even after the Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse set a definite end date for the show, Jack still remained rudderless for a while. In order to play up the “Man of Science/Man of Faith” conflict between Jack and John Locke, Jack turned into a giant douchebag who kept arguing that the island wasn’t special and there was a rational explanation for everything going on, even though he had already seen his dead father, a smoke monster and Richard Alpert’s beautiful, ageless eyelashes. Not since Scully in the later seasons of The X-Files had a character so desperately grasped at straws in an attempt to rationalize away the supernatural.
Of course, building conflict between Jack and Locke wasn’t the only reason for Jack’s stagnancy in character development. The other problem the writers had with Jack was one many writers face – you can’t really have Jack get better until the show is ready to wrap up. It’s the same reason Dr. Gregory House is still struggling with his pain pill addiction and why, after it seemed like she was cured, Tara Gregson is one again being overtaken by her alters. If Jack finds inner-peace and finally stops fighting the island in season four, it kind of ruins his arc in seasons five and six. A mentally healthy character who finds inner-peace is a boring character.
What’s great now, as the show winds down, is that the writers can finally give Jack the ending he deserves. Ever since he took that timeout after smashing the mirrors in the lighthouse, Jack has finally reached enlightenment. He was the only character who didn’t want to leave the island on the sub last night (of course Kate, with her uncanny ability to have firearms drawn on her, got shot, which forced him onto the sub). Then, on the sub, he got to be in the John Locke role as he attempted to convince everyone that nothing would happen if they let the bomb count down to zero (which is the second time he’s done that this season – the first being on the Black Rock with Richard). Sawyer was actually the character in the “Man of Science” role – dismissing Jack as crazy and pulling the chords on the bomb anyway.
Of course, if Jack’s faith in the island at that moment and his take charge attitude once the sub began to sink (he was once again ready to drown alongside Sun and Jin in order to try to save Sun), your heart had to melt a bit once he finally got to the shore. I held up okay when Sun and Jin drowned together and when Hurley and Kate started to break down, but when Jack walked away from the rest of the group to cry by himself, I almost had to find my own little corner of the beach to start bawling.
Most interesting, of course, was the fact that Sayid told Jack to find Desmond in the well “because it’s going to be you, Jack.” All season long, we’ve been told about the candidates and it’s been implied that someone will have to step up and replace Jacob. It seems like, at least in Sayid’s eyes, Jack is the man for that job. I, of course, happen to agree with Sayid. Being a deity engaged in an eternal battle with Smoke Monster Locke seems like a fitting job for a guy with a hero complex. So I’m really happy that he ended up where he has, even if the road getting here has been a bit bumpy.
Of course, even if you don’t agree with me that Jack has finally redeemed himself, I think we can all safely agree on one thing – Kate still sucks.
Joel Murphy is the creator of HoboTrashcan, which is probably why he has his own column. He loves pugs, hates Jimmy Fallon and has an irrational fear of robots. You can contact him at murphyslaw@hobotrashcan.com.
Did anyone let out a little smile when Kate took a bullet?
[Reply]
Oh my gosh, I cannot believe I am just now finding your blog and there are only 3 more seasons in the Lost series! Great job on the Jack analysis. I have always had a soft spot for Jack, I have never given up on him and it has been fascinating to watch his evolution.
I do believe that he is the candidate the replacement and I couldn’t be happier.
And I must also agree with you about Kate. She is horrible! I have always felt that her character was a waste and very weak. She cannot stand on her own and Kate’s episodes are always boring and predictable. I giggled when she got shot, but unfortunately she will survive.
[Reply]
Funny, Season 3 was when I finally started liking Jack. I had him pegged as an uptight, tortured stick-in-the-mud (and had been attracted to Locke’s character from the beginning) and I never found his hero complex compelling through Seasons 1 and 2.
What I did find compelling was seeing him threaten to let Ben die if he didn’t let Jack’s friends go.
My father is a doctor. I understand how fundamental the Hippocratic oath is to the profession and to all of us. Plus, I’ve watched MASH. So seeing a doctor strip himself of that part of his identity based on other loyalties was pretty profound, and made it clear to me that Jack was willing to think for himself and face the psychic consequences. This felt both like a logical extension of what he was willing to do to try to escape from his minder Juliet, but again, that act of surgery showed his existential stuff.
[Reply]
You briefly mention Jack and the eye scene from the first episode. This has all happened many times before, and when I say many, I mean many. Way before Episode one. Jack/Locke have been through this many times.
[Reply]
Ding, ding, ding! Oh, Joel. You always say what I’m thinking…;) I actually have to fight back a lump in my throat just seeing the picture of him here. Oh Jack Shepard, we love you! I agree he would be perfect for taking over Jacob’s job. He’s already comfortable hanging around Locke Monster knowing that he can’t hurt him.
[Reply]
I really enjoyed your redemption analysis of Dr. Jack Shepard. He has royaly pissed me off with his hard headed unwillingness to see outside of what is physically possible as a man of science. But this season he is different. And I like him so much more – other than his breaking of the lighthouse mirrors. And I am so glad you talked about what Sayid said to him – I also interpreted it in him saying “it’s going to be you” who is the candidate who takes over for Jacob. I am extremely interested in seeing what happens once Jack and Desmond link up. There will be some majorly enlightened dudes gracing the screen on that happy day.
[Reply]
The Baxter – Oh, I smiled. I definitely smiled.
Keke – Thanks so much for the kind words. I’m glad you found us, even if it took you this long.
Jeremiah – You are right, early on in season three, Jack was awesome. His scenes with Ben and Juliet were fantastic. I think people started to lose patience with him toward the middle of that season though.
lost fan – I think you may be on to something there. I do think we could be headed for that type of finale. If nothing else, I do think it ends with Jack back on the beach post-plane crash, shades of season one.
Sara – I love the term Locke Monster. It makes him sound like a character on Sesame Street.
Amanda – I look forward to the meeting of the enlightened dudes. Namaste.
[Reply]
Of course, building conflict between Jack and Locke wasn’t the only reason for Jack’s stagnancy in character development. The other problem the writers had with Jack was one many writers face – you can’t really have Jack get better until the show is ready to wrap up.
Let me get this straight. Jack had remained a stagnant character, until he became . . . likeable? Why is it that likeable characters are only considered well written? Or why does the lead character in any story is required to be likeable with very few flaws?
[Reply]
Balls
[Reply]
Human beings – for some reason or other – expect leaders to know everything and always do the right thing. Always. And without fail. Humans seemed to have little tolerance toward the imperfections of our leaders. This certainly seemed to be the case for fictional characters who are leaders. And many fans of “LOST” had harbored a deep lack of tolerance toward Jack and Ana-Lucia’s personal failings.
I believe that gender (and racial) politics may have played a role in the fans’ opinion of Jack. His main crime seemed to be that he did not fit the image of a heroic leading white male character. Physically, he looked the part. Unfortunately for Jack, he had failed to live up to those looks. He made the wrong choices on several occasions – choices that included his decision to continue Daniel Farraday’s plan to set off the nuclear bomb Jughead in the Season Five finale, (5.16/5.17) “The Incident”.
Jack had received more complaints about his relationship with Kate, along with his tendencies to get emotional and shed tears than for anything else. Once again, many “LOST” fans managed to prove that we still live in a patriarchal society. It was okay for female characters to shed tears in very emotional moments, but not male characters. Especially if that one male character happened to be the series’ leading character.
Sometime back in Season Two or Season Three, actor Matthew Fox and the show’s producers, Carlton Cuse and Damon Lindelof, made it known to the media and viewers that they were doing something different with the Jack Shephard character. They took a superficially heroic type – a brilliant surgeon that assumed leadership of a group of stranded castaways – and deconstructed him. In other words, they slowly but surely exposed his flaws and took the character to what could be viewed as the nadir of his existence. Jack eventually climbed out of that existence by the series’ last season. But certain fans on many “LOST” message boards and forums made it clear this was not a path they had wanted Jack to take. Instead, these fans had wanted – or demanded that Jack behave like a conventional hero.
[Reply]
He made the wrong choices on several occasions – choices that included his decision to continue Daniel Farraday’s plan to set off the nuclear bomb Jughead in the Season Five finale, (5.16/5.17) “The Incident”.
I take it back. I now realize that this was never a mistake. In fact, this was one case in which Jack had made the right decision . . . even if it was for the wrong reason.
[Reply]